Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8275/2025 of SRI SUBRAMANYAN K Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 17 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010383242025 NC: 2026:KHC:36912 CRL.P No. 8275 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8275 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI SUBRAMANYAN K, S/O LATE KARPASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 71
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8275 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI SUBRAMANYAN K,
S/O LATE KARPASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
ZENITH CONSULTANCY, MALLESHWARAM,
R/O G2, KAGADASAPURA,
DR. C.V. RAMAN NAGAR,
BANGALORE – 560093.
(AS PER CHARGE SHETT)
SRI SUBRAMANIAN K,
S/O KARUPPASWAMY MUDALIAR,
R/AT #74/1, 4TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN,
SWIMMING POOL EXTN,
BANGALORE NORTH
BENGALURU - 560003.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI SHIVAJI H MANE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
KUSHALNAGAR RURAL POLICE STATION,
MADIKERI,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU - 560001.
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
PRASANA B G,
S/O GANAPATHI B.A,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
MANAGING PARTNER,
BUSINESS, CLASS FIRM,
NO. 37, VAJRA FARM, HEGGEDAHALLI,
KUSHALNAGAR TALUK, KODAGU.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R-1;
R-2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) TO A. QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C NO. 501/2025
PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR KODAGU FOR THE O/P 420 AND 34 OF IPC AS
AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 (ANNEXURE C) AND
ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo indicating that the petitioner is no more and the petition does not survive for consideration and has become infructuous.
2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO The counsel for Petitioner craves leave to submit that the Petitioner had challenged the proceedings in
HC-KAR
C.C.No.501/2025 filed by Respondent against him before the Hon’ble Civil Judge and JMFC, Kushalnagar Kodagu. During the pendency of the Petition, the Petitioner died on 10.03.2026 and his wife has provided the copy of death certificate of the Petitioner. In view of the same the Petition becomes infructuous as abated. Hence this memo. The copy of death certificate of the Petitioner is herewith enclosed for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. Hence, the Petition filed by the Petitioner may be dismissed as infructuous in the interest of justice.”
In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10