Karnataka High Court
WP/14217/2022 of P RAJIV Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 17 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010314202022 NC: 2026:KHC:36886 WP No. 14217 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 14217 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. P. RAJIV, S/O PANDURANGA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 14217 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
P. RAJIV,
S/O PANDURANGA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: MLA,
KUDACHI ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY,
HARUGERI, RAYABAG TALUK,
BELGAVI DISTRICT - 590 004.
2.
HANUMANTHA RAMAPPA KURI,
S/O RAMAPPA KURI,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: PHOTOGRAPHER,
HARUGERI, RAYABAG TALUK,
DISTRICT BELGAUM - 591 220.
3.
SHIVANAND @ SHIVAPPA
RAMAPPA DALWAI,
S/O RAMAPPA DALWAI,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: BUSINESS,
HARUGERI RAYABAG TALUK,
DISTRICT BELGAUM - 591 220.
4.
KANTU RAMU BYADAGI,
S/O SRI RAMAPPA BYADAGI,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST,
R/AT HARUGERI CROSS,
RAYABAG TALUK,
DISTRICT BELGAUM - 591 220.
5.
BASAVARAJ RAGHAVENDRA KOTHA,
S/O SRI RAGHAVENDRA KOTHA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT HARUGERI, TALUK RAYABAG,
DISTRICT BELGAUM - 591 220.
6.
NYAMANNA PRADHANI NAGAVI,
S/O SRI PRADHANI NAGAVI,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST,
R/AT HARUGERI, RAYABAG TALUK,
DISTRICT BELGAUM - 591 220.
7.
AJITH NINGAPPA IRAGAR,
S/O SRI. NINGAPPA IRAGAR,
OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/AT CHINCHALI,
DISTRICT BELGAUM - 591 220.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY KUDACHI POLICE,
RAYABAG CIRCLE,
RAYABAG TALUK,
BELAGAVI DISTRICT,
HC-KAR
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SRI. SANGAPPA ITAPPA KAMBLE,
S/O ITAPPA KAMBLE,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT KUDACHI,
RAYBAGH TALUK,
BELGAUM - 591 220.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.THEJESH P., HCGP FOR R1;
R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11.04.2022 PASSED
BY THE LEARNED LXXXI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE,
BENGALURU
(CCH-82)
IN
SPL.C.NO.343/2018
WHEREIN THE LEARNED SPECIAL JUDGE WAS PLEASED TO
HOLD
THAT
THERE
WAS
PRIMA-FACIA
MATERIAL
TO
PROSECUTE THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSEDS NO.1 TO 7 FOR
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 447, 323, 504, 506, 427 R/W SEC. 149 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE
AND UNDER SEC.3(i)(c) OF THE SCHEDULE CASTE AND
SCHEDULED TRIBE (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989
VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC.,
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel to the petitioners submits, the petition is rendered infructuous, in the light of the acquittal of the petitioners.
Submission is placed on record.
In that light, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
HR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 76