Karnataka High Court
RSA/1780/2012 of SHRI. T. VENKATARAVANAPPA Vs SHRI C NARAYANAPPA on 16 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010363542012 NC: 2026:KHC:36369 RSA No. 1780 of 2012 C/W RSA No. 1781 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1780 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ) C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1780 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ)
C/W
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1781 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ)
IN RSA NO.1780/2012:
BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI. T. VENKATARAVANAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. V. VISWANATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SHRI. C. NARAYANAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125.
(VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2026, R1 IS DELETED)
2.
SHRI. T.V. RAMAMAKRISHNA REDDY
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2(a)
SMT. SUJATHAMMA
W/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
2(b)
SRI. HARISH
S/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE
MURUGAMALLA HOBLI
CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125.
2(c)
SMT. MAMATHA
D/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
W/O NARAYANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
R/AT NO.263/1,
OLD POLICE STATION, 3RD CROSS
BEHIND VASAVI MAHAL, K.R.PURAM
BENGALURU-560 036.
(AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 06.02.2026)
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N.ARUN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2(a to c); VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2026, R1 IS DELETED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.07.2012
PASSED IN R.A.NO.20/2005 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND
SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED
31.01.2005 PASSED IN O.S.NO.71/2000 ON THE FILE OF
PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI.
HC-KAR
IN RSA NO.1781/2012:
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. T. VENKATARAVANAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
2.
SRI. J.V. RAMESH
S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YERAS
BOTH ARE
R/AT JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE
MURAGAMALLA HOBLI
CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. V. VISWANATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. T.V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
2(a)
SMT. SUJATHAMMA
W/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
2(b)
SRI. HARISH
S/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE
IRGAMPALLI POST
CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125.
HC-KAR
2(c)
SMT. MAMATHA
D/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
W/O NARAYANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
R/AT NO.263/1,
OLD POLICE STATION, 3RD CROSS
BEHIND VASAVI MAHAL, K.R.PURAM
BENGALURU-560 036.
(AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 06.02.2026)
2.
SRI. C. NARAYANAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YERAS
R/AT JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE
MURAGAMALLA HOBLI
CHINTAMANI TALUK.
(VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2026, R2 IS DELETED,)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N.ARUN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1(a to c); VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2026, R2 IS DELETED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.07.2012
PASSED IN R.A.NO.62/2006 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL
AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED
14.07.2006 PASSED IN O.S.NO.88/2001 ON THE FILE OF
PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), AND JMFC, AND C/c OF
ADDITIONAL
CIVIL
JUDGE
(JR.DN.)
AND
JMFC,
CHINTAMANI.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
The appellant and the legal representatives of respondent No.2 have filed the compromise petition under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. In the compromise petition, it is stated that at the intervention of the well wishers and relatives, the parties have settled the matter.
2. In the compromise petition, the properties which were allotted in favour of the appellant and legal representatives of respondent No.2 are stated in detail and in terms of the compromise, prays the Court to decree the suit of the appellant by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Chintamani in R.A.No.20/2005 dated 25.07.2012 and confirm the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.71/2000 dated 31.01.2005 passed by the Junior Civil Judge and JMFC at Chintamani.
3. The parties have understood the terms of the compromise and the legal representatives of respondents, who
HC-KAR
are present before the Court also say that prayer sought in the compromise may be recorded.
4. The appellant and legal representatives of respondent No.1 have also filed a compromise petition in connected appeal in R.S.A.No.1781/2012. In the compromise petition, the properties which were allotted in favour of the appellant and legal representatives of respondent No.1 are stated in detail and in terms of the compromise, prays the Court to decree the suit of the appellant by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Chintamani in R.A.No.62/2006 dated 25.07.2012 and confirm the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.88/2001 dated 14.07.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and JMFC at Chintamani and parties are one and the same and terms of the compromise are understood by the parties.
5. Hence, the compromise petitions are accepted.
6. Accordingly, the regular second appeals are disposed of in terms of the compromise.
HC-KAR
The Registry is directed to draw the decree in terms of the compromise Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18