Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/682/2024 of SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI Vs M NAGARAJ on 16 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010278402024 NC: 2026:KHC:36366 CRL.RP No. 682 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.682 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O LINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 47
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010278402024
NC: 2026:KHC:36366
CRL.RP No. 682 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.682 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O LINGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT NO.18, 2ND CROSS
SHIVANAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURu-560 010.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARAYANASWAMY K.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
M. NAGARAJ
S/O LATE V MARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT NO.81/19, 12TH ‘C’ MAIN ROAD,
SHIVANAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560010.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. N.C. NARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
CONVICTION
DATED
01.01.2022
PASSED
IN
C.C.NO.10482/2018 ON THE FILE OF XIII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER DATED 05.03.2024 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.1109/2022
ON THE FILE OF LVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE (CCH-57) AT BENGALURU.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010278402024
NC: 2026:KHC:36366
CRL.RP No. 682 of 2024
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is listed for admission. I have perused the material on record and there was no cross-examination before the Trial Court and no defence evidence is led by the accused. The accused also not replied to the notice which was issued by the complainant. Hence, no ground to admit the revision petition.
Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31