Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6309/2026 of SRI.CHETAN G Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 16 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010289622026 NC: 2026:KHC:36568 CRL.P No. 6309 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6309 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHETAN G S/O A . GANESH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6309 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. CHETAN G
S/O A. GANESH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
2.
SMT. SHRUTHI CHETAN
W/O SRI. CHETAN G
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE
R/O NO. 29, 2ND MAIN, 5TH CROSS,
A BLOCK, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT,
DAVANAGRE - 577 006.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PRABHU PUJAR S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
BY DCRE POLICE STATION,
THE DAVANAGERE,
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. K.H. MANJULA
W/O RANGANATHA
RESIDING AT 3RD MAIN,
15TH CROSS, VINOBANAGARA,
DAVANAGERE - 577 006.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNSS) OF
CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME
NO.6/2026 DATED 05.04.2025 FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 352, 329(4), 115(2) AND 351(2) R/W SEC.3(5) OF BNS 2023 AND
SEC.3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v-a) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 1989
PENDING
2nd
ADDL
DISTRICT
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
DAVANAGERE DIST DAVANAGERE AS THE SAME IS AN ABUSE
OF PROCESS OF LAW AND IS LIABLE TO BE SET ASIDE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
Undersigned counsel for petitioner in the above case may be charge sheet in the case may be
HC-KAR
chargesheet in the case liberty to file appeal in the interest of equity."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16