Karnataka High Court

CRL.RP/378/2025 of SRI M VELAYUDHAN Vs SRI M LAKKEGOWDA on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010143782025 NC: 2026:KHC:36515 CRL.RP No. 378 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.378 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. M. VELAYUDHAN, S/O LATE MURUGESHAN, AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.378 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. M. VELAYUDHAN,

S/O LATE MURUGESHAN,

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.173/A,

1ST MAIN, SARVABOUMANAGARA,

NEAR PLAY GROUND, UTTARAHALLI,

BENGALURU -570061.

AND ALSO PROPRIETOR OF

COTTON COLLECTIONS,

NO.28, SUBRAMANAYAPURA MAIN ROAD,

UTTARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560061

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHRIDHARA K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

AND:

1.

SRI. M. LAKKEGOWDA,

S/O LATE MARIGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.51/1,

50 FEET ROAD, 25TH MAIN,

GIRINAGARA,

BENGALURU -560085.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. REVANNA M.S., ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF

CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE

THE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

AND

ORDER

OF CONVICTION DATED 15.03.2022 IN C.C.NO.1193/2018 PASSED BY THE XII ADDL.C.M.M AT BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.11.2024 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.441/2022 ON THE FILE OF LXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

ORAL ORDER

This matter is called twice both in the morning session and also in the afternoon session and there is no representation by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that even the conditional order dated 22.05.2025 is not complied with and bond is also not executed under Section 436A of Cr.P.C.

3. This Court vide order dated 25.06.2025 extended the time for compliance of the conditional order. Thereafter also, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner not pursued the matter. However, the matter was referred to Lok-Adalath

HC-KAR

and the matter was not settled before the Lok-Adalath on 13.12.2025. Thereafter, the matter was referred to the Special Mediation Drive and the same was not settled and report of the mediation is also received that both the parties never appeared and more than 60 days of statutory period is over from the date of reference for mediation. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner is not pursuing the matter diligently and also not complied with the conditional order and hence, the criminal revision petition is dismissed.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead