Karnataka High Court
WP/29055/2024 of MOHAMMED RAFI SUBHAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010623272024 NC: 2026:KHC:36236 WP No. 29055 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 29055 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MOHAMMED RAFI SUBHAN, S/O SUBHAN AMANULLA KHAN, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 29055 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED RAFI SUBHAN,
S/O SUBHAN AMANULLA KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/A S14, 1002, SMONDOVILLE,
NEO TOWN, ELECTRONIC CITY,
BENGALURU- 560 100.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KARTHIK KIRAN K S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY
HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION,
NEO TOWN, GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE,
JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL,
BANGALORE DISTRICT, KARNATAKA.
2.
MANJUNATH R,
S/O RAVI,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
R/A OUT REACH WORKER,
DCPO OFFICE,
BANGALORE WEST, ANEKAL TQ,
BANGALORE DISTRICT, KARNATAKA.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1 & R2;
SRI.SUYOG HERELE E, ADVOCATE FOR
IMPLEADING APPLICANT)
Digitally signed
by PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF
THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973, PRAYING TO
QUASH
THE
COMPLAINT
AND
FIR
DTD.
11.09.2024
REGISTERED IN CR.NO. 0579/2024 BY HEBBAGOODI POLICE
STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
323, 506 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 8 AND 12 OF POCSO PENDING
ON THE FILE OF FAST TRACK COURT-1 BANGALORE RURAL
PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURES-A AND B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "The undersigned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the instant Petition since the Respondent No.1 Police have filed chargesheet before the Hon'ble Trial Judge, who has taken cognizance of the offences alleged. Wherefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose the instant petition as Withdrawn with liberty to approach this Hon'ble Court challenging the Chargesheet in the interest of justice and equity."
HC-KAR
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
CBC List No.: 4 Sl No.: 5