Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10758/2025 of ANAND H Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35963 CRL.P No. 10758 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10758 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: 1. ANAND H S/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10758 OF 2025
(482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-)
BETWEEN:
1.
ANAND H
S/O HANUMANTHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT: LAKSHMISAGARA
KASABA HOBLI,
SIRA TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 139.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LETHIF B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY SIRA POLICE STATION,
TUMKUR DISTRICT,
REP. BY SPP,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE 560001
2.
NAVEENA R
S/O RANGANATHANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
R/AT" BHAVANI NAGARA
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
SIRA TOWN
TUMKUR - 572 137
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.331/2025 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S
109, 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 352 R/W 3(5) OF BNS, PENDING
ON THE FILE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT AT SIRA, TUMKUR DISTRICT WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO
Undersigned Counsel for the Petitioner hereby submits that the petition may be withdrawn with a liberty to challenge the charge sheet, since the charge sheet has been filed in the above case during the pendency of the petition even while the interim order was existence, same may be taken on record in the interest of justice. "
HC-KAR
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8