Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/845/2026 of SRI K.C.RAVI KUMAR Vs SRI ANJANEYA REDDY on 15 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010351312026 NC: 2026:KHC:36924 CRL.RP No. 845 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 845 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI K.C.RAVI KUMAR S/O CHIKKASIDDAPPA, AGED
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010351312026
NC: 2026:KHC:36924
CRL.RP No. 845 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 845 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI K.C.RAVI KUMAR
S/O CHIKKASIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT NO.2682, 3RD CROSS,
VIVEKANDA MAIN ROAD,
BANGARPET.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. UDHAYA KUMAR G,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI ANJANEYA REDDY
S/O VENKATAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT. MADANAHALLI VILLAGE,
VELAGALABURRE POST,
KOLAR TALUK,KOLAR.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401(FILED U/S.438
R/W SEC.442 BNSS) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE
PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE
PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER AND JUDGMENT PASSED
BY THE HONBLE I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KOLAR IN
C.C.NO.862/2018
DATED
21.08.2023
AND
IN
CRL.A.NO.101/2023 BY ORDER DATED 05.02.2026 PASSED BY
THE HONBLE II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010351312026
NC: 2026:KHC:36924
CRL.RP No. 845 of 2026
KOLAR THE HONBLE COURT HAS DISMISSED THE SAID CASE
FOR DEVOID OF MERTIS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of revision petitioner.
2. This matter was listed on 01.07.2026. It is also observed that on last date of hearing, the counsel for the revision petitioner sought time to get the deposition but he remained absent and one more opportunity is given to the counsel for the revision petitioner and made it clear that if the counsel fails to appear before the Court on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed. Inspite of it, the counsel for revision petitioner is not pursuing the matter. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SSD/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44