Karnataka High Court
WP/10349/2025 of SRI H G VENKATACHALAPATHY @ CHALAPATHY Vs STATE BY CUBBON PARK POLICE, on 15 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010209192025 NC: 2026:KHC:36118 WP No. 10349 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 10349 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. H.G.VENKATACHALAPATHY @ CHALAPATHY, S/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 10349 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. H.G.VENKATACHALAPATHY @ CHALAPATHY, S/O GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2, ANAKANUR VILLAGE, NEAR CHICKBALLAPUR PRISON, CHICKBALLAPUR TQ.
AND DISTRICT - 562 101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GIRISHA T.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY CUBBON PARK POLICE,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SRI. BHEEMASENA GHATAGE,
POLICE OFFICER,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
CUBBON PARK POLICE STATION, K.B.ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1;
R2 SERVED;
SMT.K.P.JAYASIMHA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 528 OF BNS PRAYING
TO DIRECT QUASHING THE CHARGE SHEET SO FAR AS THE
PETITIONER IS CONCERNED A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED
AT ANNX-B; GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO PENDING
DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WP TO STAY ALL FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO CHARGE SHEET A COPY OF
WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNX-B SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS
CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP on instructions would submit that the charges have been framed and the petition would not be entertainable at this juncture.
2. In the light of the charges being framed, the entertainment of the petition will run foul of the judgment of
HC-KAR
the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR KUMAR1.
3. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy, as is available in law, the petition stands disposed.
4. To urge all the contentions before the concerned Court, it is needless to observe that the petitioner's contention that nothing is there against accused No.3, the petitioner also shall bear consideration at the hands of the concerned Court.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5