Karnataka High Court
WA/2151/2025 of SMT PRIYANKA Vs THE CHIEF MANAGER on 15 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010852132025 NC: 2026:KHC:36063-DB WA No. 2151 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 2151 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT PRIYANKA W/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT APPEAL NO. 2151 OF 2025 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT PRIYANKA
W/O SRI ABHIJITH KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
WORKING AS ASSISTANT MANAGER,
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,
KORAMANGALA BRANCH,
RESIDING AT NO. A-128,
TRINITY MEADOWS APARTMENT,
BELLANDUR MAIN ROAD,
BELLANDUR,
BANGALORE 560 103.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NAVEEN J N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE CHIEF MANAGER
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,
NO. 92, 80 FEET ROAD,
6TH BLOCK,
KORAMANGALA,
BANGALORE 560 095.
2.
THE REGIONAL MANAGER
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,
1ST FLOOR,
Digitally signed
by VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
SANTHOSH CINEMA COMPLEX,
K G ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. Y.R.SADASHIVA REDDY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
Ms. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 30/10/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.13177/2021 AND GRANT THE APPELLANT ALL
THE RELIEFS PRAYED IN SAID WRIT PETITION AND PASS
SUCH OTHER ORDER/ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY
PLEASE
TO
PASS
CONSIDERING
THE
FACTS
AND
CIRCUMSTANCES
INCLUDING
THE
COST
OF
THE
PROCEEDINGS.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present writ appeal has been filed against the order dated 13.10.2025 passed by the writ Court in W.P.No.13177/2021 filed by the appellant challenging the notice dated 28.06.2021 issued by the Chief Manager, Central
HC-KAR
Bank of India, Bengaluru directing her to report on duty within 30 days of notice, failing which, it would be treated that the appellant/petitioner has voluntarily vacated her appointment/employment in the Central Bank of India.
2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the appellant was willing to report for duty in the place of posting where she was transferred i.e., Regional Office, Vijayawada. In view of the said submission, this Court on 22.04.2026 passed the following order:
"Learned counsel for the respondent Bank submits that the appellant has been transferred to Regional Office, Vijayawada. The appellant is permitted to join the Regional Office, Vijayawada by 27.04.2026 as per the transfer order, which though has not been produced but the Court is informed that the appellant stand transferred to Vijayawada. The appellant shall be paid full salary after she joins the services on 27.04.2026. In case of failure of the appellant to report for duty at Regional Office, Vijayawada on 27.04.2026, the
HC-KAR
appellant shall not be entitled to join the services till the disciplinary proceedings contemplated against her are culminated in the final order. The respondent Bank is directed to allow the appellant to join the Regional Office, Vijayawada as on her reporting on 27.04.2026."
3. Today, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant/petitioner does not wish to join the Regional Office, Vijayawada in compliance of the order dated 22.04.2026.
4. We find no reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The appellant has misled this Court that she was willing to join the transfer post at Vijayawada and in fact violated the order dated 22.04.2026 which was passed on her undertaking that she would go and join the Regional Office at Vijayawada.
5. We, therefore, find no infirmity or illegality in the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge and therefore, the writ appeal stands dismissed.
HC-KAR
6. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13