Karnataka High Court

CRL.RP/718/2026 of VARALAKSHMI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010317752026 NC: 2026:KHC:36263 CRL.RP No. 718 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.718 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. VARALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS W/O LATE

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010317752026

NC: 2026:KHC:36263

CRL.RP No. 718 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.718 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

1.

VARALAKSHMI

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

W/O LATE SHIVAKUMAR

2.

PAVAN KUMAR

S/O LATE SHIVAKUMAR

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

3.

PRAVEEN KUMAR

S/O LATE SHIVAKUMAR

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE

R/AT 45, SRI LAKSHMI NIVASA

OPP. TO OMSHREE SCHOOL

SSM LAYOUT, M.V.EXTENSION

HOSAKOTE

BENGALURU RURAL-562114

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. NARAYANA REDDY M, ADVOCATE)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

FIU DIVISION, CID

CORLTON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD

BENGALURU - 560 001

(REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010317752026

NC: 2026:KHC:36263

CRL.RP No. 718 of 2026

HIGH COURT BUILDINGS

DR. B.R. AMBEDAKR ROAD

BANGALORE - 560 001

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. M DIVAKR MADDUR, HCGP)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED

U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO REVISE AND SET ASIDE

THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNEXURE-E DTD 02.04.2026 PASSED

BY THE LRD. PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS AND SPECIAL JUDGE, BENGALURU

RURAL

DISTRICT,

BENGALURU

IN

SPL.C.NO.292/2024 AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

In view of withdrawal of the main petition, I.A. if any, does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead