Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/949/2026 of AMIR KHAN ALIAS NAWAZ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 14 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35755 CRL.A No. 949 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 949 OF 2026 (C) BETWEEN: AMIR KHAN ALIAS NAWAZ, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL WAHAB, RESIDENT AT NO.48,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 949 OF 2026 (C)
BETWEEN:
AMIR KHAN ALIAS NAWAZ,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
S/O. ABDUL WAHAB,
RESIDENT AT NO.48,
IRONG KHAUNOU,
MAYANG PAUL POLICE STATION,
THOUBAI, MANIPUR,
INDIA – 795 133.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. BHAIRAV KUTTAIAH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY K.G. HALLI POLICE STATION,
NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD,
VINOBHA NAGAR,
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
KADUGONDANAHALLI,
BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA – 560 045.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. CHENNAPPA ERAPPA., HCGP)
----
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C (FILED U/S 415
OF BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT/S PRAYING
TO
SETTING
ASIDE
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
AND
ORDER
OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 02.09.2023, PASSED BY THE XXXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS) AT BENGALURU (C.C.H. NO.33), IN SPL.C.C.NO.2122/2022, THEREBY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 17(B) OF THE NDPS ACT, 1985 AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal as the prayer of the appeal having become infructuous.
2. Considering the same, leave is granted. The appeal stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5