Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6164/2026 of SRI RAMAKRISHNA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 14 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35821 CRL.P No. 6164 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6164 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMAKRISHNA S/O. SRI. DEVARAJU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 2. SRI. DEVARAJU.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6164 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. RAMAKRISHNA
S/O. SRI. DEVARAJU
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
2.
SRI. DEVARAJU.
S/O. LATE SRI. KULLEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
3.
SMT. MANASA,
W/O. SRI. RAMAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
4.
SMT. LALITHA,
W/O. SRI. DEVARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
5.
SRI. MANOJ N.D.,
S/O. SRI. DEVARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
PETITIONERS 1 TO 5 ARE
R/O. KOTE BEEDI,
SHANTHIGRAMA VILLAGE,
HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT - 573 220.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. R.B. SADASIVAPPA, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PANDAVAPURA POLICE STATION,
MANDYA DISTRICT,
REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SMT. MEGHANA,
W/O. SRI. MANJU N.S.
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/O. NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE,
HIREMARALLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS ANNEXURE-K
IN CR.NO.86/2026 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE
JR.DN AND J.M.F.C PANDAVAPURA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
329(3), 352, 74, 115(2), 75, 133, 118(1), 119(1), 351(2), 49
R/W 3(5) OF BNS 2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The petitioners in the above petition submit that the above petition is not pressed and hence, the petitioners pray that this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit them to withdraw the same with a liberty to pursue the remedy after filing of the charge sheet, in the interest of justice and equity."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22