Karnataka High Court

WP/19628/2026 of BHARATH S Vs STATE BY MAGADI ROAD POLICE STATION on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:35927 WP No. 19628 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19628 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. BHARATH S LATE K.SIDDARAJU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT. NO.87, 6TH CROSS

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

WRIT PETITION NO. 19628 OF 2026 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

BHARATH S

LATE K.SIDDARAJU

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

R/AT. NO.87, 6TH CROSS

MAGADI ROAD,BENGALURU-560023.

2.

PRAVEEN KUMAR NAIDU

S/O. JANARDHAN NIADU

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

R/AT. U-9, 2ND CROSS

OPP THAMMAYYAPPA PARK

MAGADI ROAD, K.P.AGRAHARA

BENGALURU-560023.

3.

KIRAN KUMAR.S

S/O. LATE K.SIDDARAJ

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

R/AT. NO.1/87, 6TH CROSS

MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU-560023.

4.

SRI. SHASHI KUMAR

K.SIDDARAJU

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

R/AT. NO.87, 6TH CROSS

MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU-560023.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. HARISH PRABHU S., ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by

DHANALAKSHMI

MURTHY

Location: HIGH

COURTOF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

AND:

1.

STATE BY MAGADI ROAD POLICE STATION

REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BENGALURU-560001.

2.

PRAVEEN

S/O. BHAVAN RAO

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

R/AT. J.B.MEN'S COLLECTION

NO.86, 6TH CROSS, RIGHT SIDE

MAGADI ROAD, OPP. UDUPI HOTEL

MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560023

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. DEEPTI ALWA, HCGP., FOR R1

SRI. GIRISH R, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE

A WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS

IN C.C.NO. 36904/2024 VIDE (ANNEXURE-C AND D) FOR

OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 341, 323, 504, 506, R/W SECTION 34 IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 24TH

ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU

REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 MAGADI ROAD

POLICE IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED, IN THE

INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners call in question the proceedings in C.C.No.36904/2024 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC.

2. Heard Sri. Harish Prabhu S., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri Girish R., learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 and have perused the material on record.

3. During the pendency of these proceedings, it transpires that the parties to the lis have entered into a settlement and the joint memo reads as follows:

“Joint Memo

That the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 most respectfully submit as follows:

1. The petitioners herein are arrayed as Accused Nos. 1 to 4 in C.C.No.36904/2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34 of IPC on

HC-KAR

the file of 24th ACMM, Bengaluru, registered by the respondent No.1.

2. That the said criminal proceedings were initiated on the basis of a complaint lodged by Respondent No. 2/Complainant, following which the Respondent Police registered the FIR and filed a charge sheet against the petitioners.

3. It is submitted that during the pendency of the proceedings, the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 have amicably resolved and settled all their disputes, differences, and grievances through mutual dialogue and the intervention of well-wishers, resulting in a genuine compromise.

4. That the settlement has been arrived at voluntarily, without any coercion, undue influence, or pressure from any side. The Complainant has further affirmed that they have no objection to the proceedings being quashed in the interest of justice.

5. That the compromise entered into between the parties is intended to foster good relations and save the career and future prospects of the Accused and the parties involved.

HC-KAR

6. That no final judgment has been passed in the case, and this Hon'ble Court is competent to pass any appropriate orders under section 482 of Criminal Procedure.

PRAYER

Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court maybe graciously pleased to:

a) Quash the entire Proceedings in C.C.No.36904/2024 for the offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34 of IPC on the file of 24th ACMM, Bengaluru, registered by the respondent No.1, in the interest of justice. b) Pass any other suitable order as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity.”

4. In light of the settlement arrived at between the parties as afore-quoted, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. Criminal Petition is disposed.

HC-KAR

ii. Proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No.36904/2024 pending before the XXIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, stands quashed.

Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 233

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead