Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/747/2025 of MR A MUNIRAJU Vs MR N NANJEGOWDA on 13 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35465 CRL.RP No. 747 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.747 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR A MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O SRI. ANEAPPA R/AT DODDAGUBBI
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:35465
CRL.RP No. 747 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.747 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
MR A MUNIRAJU
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O SRI. ANEAPPA
R/AT DODDAGUBBI
DODDAGUBBI VILLAGE & POST,
BANGALORE -560077
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHANA CHANDRA P, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MR N NANJEGOWDA
S/O LATE G. N. RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT NO.247
DODDAGUBBI VILLAGE & POST
BANGALORE -560077
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRANESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)
This CRL.RP is FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 (FILED U/S.438
R/W SEC.442 BNSS) of CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT DATED 12.03.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF
LXXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL
UNIT, BENGALURU in Crl.A.NO.25283/2023 and etc.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:35465
CRL.RP No. 747 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner and the respondent along with their respective counsel are present.
2. The respective parties have filed a joint memo reporting the settlement. In view of the joint memo, the parties have amicably settled the matter. Hence, the petition may be allowed and petitioner may be acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act.
3. The counsel appearing for the respective parties submit that amount has been paid in view of the settlement.
4. In view of the joint memo filed by the parties, the petition is disposed of.
5. The petitioner/accused is acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN