Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11456/2023 of HEMANTH HEGDE Vs ABHIJIN HEGDE on 13 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35589 CRL.P No. 11456 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11456 OF 2023 BETWEEN: HEMANTH HEGDE, S/O GANAPATHI HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11456 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
HEMANTH HEGDE,
S/O GANAPATHI HEGDE,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/O BIDRUKHAN VILLAGE,
SIDDAPUR TALUK-581355
UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
ABHIJIN HEGDE,
D/O HEMANTH HEGDE,
AGED ABOUT 06 YEARS,
C/O NAGARAJ HEGDE,
R/AT KANTHANALLI VILLAGE,
GUDUVI POSIT, SORABA TALUK-577429.
SINCE MINOR BY NATURAL GUARDIAN &
MOTHER SMT. SUMITHRA.
2.
SUMITHRA,
W/O HEMANTH HEGDE,
C/O NAGARAJ HEGDE,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/O KANTHANAHALLI VILLAGE,
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
GUDUVI POSIT, SORABA TALUK-577429
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI R.B DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R-1& R-2; R-1 IS MINOR & REPRESENTED BY R-2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C TO A) CALL FOR
RECORDS; B) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023
PASSED BY THE COURT OF LEARNED V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
JUDGE,
SHIVAMOGGA
SITTING
AT
SAGAR
IN
CRL.RP.NO.10016/2023 DISMISSING THE REVISION PETITION
FILED BY THE PETITIONER THEREBY CONFIRMING THE ORDER
DATED 25.03.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LEARNED
PRINCIPAL
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC
SORABA
IN
CRL.MISC.NO.173/2019 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo reads as follows:
“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the revisional court thereby confirming the order passed by the learned trial Magistrate in Crl.Misc. 173/2019. The said order of the trail Magistrate court was passed on the application made by the petitioner seeking the modification of the order granting interim
HC-KAR
maintenance in favour of respondents on the changed circumstances. Now that the main petition in Crl. Misc. No. 173/2019 having been disposed off by an order dated 31.07.2024, the above petition has become infructuous and therefore the above petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous by allowing this memo in the interest of justice.”
In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as withdrawn.
I.A.No.1/2023 is also disposed, as a consequence.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 95