Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/115/2017 of SMT B GIRIJA Vs SRI T B RUDRAMURTHY on 13 July 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:35390 CRL.A No. 115 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 115 OF 2017 ( A ) BETWEEN: SMT. B. GIRIJA, W/O. N. S. PARAMESHWARA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.61,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 115 OF 2017 (A)

BETWEEN:

SMT. B. GIRIJA,

W/O. N. S. PARAMESHWARA,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.61,

1ST MAIN ROAD,

SADASHIVANAGARA,

NELAMANGALA TOWN,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT

BANGALORE – 562 123.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. PRASHANTH U. T., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI. T. B. RUDRAMURTHY,

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI B

S

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

S/O V. M. BASAPPA

RESIDING AT ASHA PALLAVI NIALYA,

B.G. PALYA CIRCLE,

TUMKUR TALUK AND

DISTRICT - 572 102.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. AMABAJI RAO NAJRE., ADVOCATE)

----

THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C BY THE

ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.08.2016, PASSED BY THE CIVIL

JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. AT NELAMANGALA, IN C.C.NO.621/2010, ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE

P/U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 AND

ETC.,

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant being aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court.

2. However, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.1, held in paragraph No.10 as under: “10. As already noted, the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC was inserted in the statute book only with effect from 31.12.2009. The object and reason for such insertion must be realised and must be given its full effect to by a court. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold that the victim of an offence has the right to prefer an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC, irrespective of whether he is a complainant or not. Even if the victim of an offence is a complainant, he can still proceed under the proviso to Section 372 and need not advert to sub- section (4) of Section 378 of the Cr.PC.”

1 2025 SCC Online SC 1320

HC-KAR

3. On careful reading of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court supra, it is evident that the complainant, being the victim, has to file an appeal against the order of acquittal before the Jurisdictional Sessions Court by invoking Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

4. In view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court, in Celestium Financial case supra, the appeal by the complainant against the order of acquittal is not maintainable before this Court. Since this Court has no jurisdiction to decide the appeal on merit, the appeal is transferred to the jurisdictional Appellate Court/Sessions Court.

5. The parties shall appear before the jurisdictional Appellate Court / Sessions Court on 17.08.2026, without further notice of the concerned Court.

6. The Registry shall transmit the entire appeal papers, including the appeal memo, to the jurisdictional Sessions Court.

HC-KAR

7. The learned counsel for the appellant shall have the liberty to carry out the amendment in the cause title and also the provisions thereof.

8. For statistical purposes, this appeal stands disposed of. Ordered accordingly. In view of the disposal of the appeal, pending I.A., if any, does not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead