Karnataka High Court
WP/21297/2021 of SRI.PRASHANTH KOTIYAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 13 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35586 CRL.P No. 10186 of 2024 C/W WP No. 21297 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10186 OF 2024 C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 21297 OF 2021 (GM-RES) IN CRL.P No.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10186 OF 2024
C/W
WRIT PETITION NO. 21297 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
IN CRL.P No. 10186/2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI PRASHANTH @ PRASHANTH KOTIYAN
@ PRASHANTH SHRIDHARA AMIN,
S/O LATE SHRIDHARA AMIN,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/A 1-203, GURU KRIPANIVASA,
SASIHITHLU VILLAGE,
MANGALORE TALUK, D K 574146.
2.
SRI SUBHASH Y KOTIAN,
S/O YELLUKOTIAN,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 1-158, BAIDHI HOUSE,
NEAR PANCHAJANYA,
SASIHITHLU VILLAGE,
MANGALORE TALUK, D K 574 146.
3.
SRI PUNITH,
S/O VAMANA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
R/AT NO. 1-220, BHAGAVATHINILAYA,
SASIHITHLU VILLAGE,
MANGALORE TALUK, D K - 574 146.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY P.S.I OF SURATHKAL P S,
SURATHKAL, D K DISTRICT,
REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
KOUSHIK KAANCHAN,
S/O SHEKHARKAANCHAN,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
R/AT VISHAL VIHARA,
NEAR RADHA KRISHNA,
BHAJANAMANDIRA,
SASIHITHLU VILLAGE,
MANGALURU CITY, D K - 574 146.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R-1;
R-2 IS SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNNS)
CR.P.C
TO
QUASH
THE
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS
IN
S.C.NO.159/2021 PENDING THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT JUDGE, MANGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/US/
341,504,323,324,326,307 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC.
HC-KAR
IN WP NO. 21297/2021
BETWEEN:
SRI PRASHANTH KOTIYAN
@ PRASHANTH SHRIDHARA AMIN,
S/O LATE SHRIDAR AMIN,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
R/A 1-203, GURU KRIPANIVASA,
SASIHITHLU VILLAGE,
MANGALORE TALUK-574146.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY P.S.I OF SURATHKAL P S,
SURATHKAL, D K DISTRICT-575014,
REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF INDIAN
CONSTITUTION
R/W
SECTION
OF
CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER
TO RE-INVESTIGATE THE MATTER IN CRIME NO.43/2020
REGISTERED BY RESPONDENT POLICE AT ANNEXURE-C
AND ALSO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO FILE
FRESH CHARGE SHEET IN THE ABOVE CASE.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo filed in Crl.P.No.10186/2024 reads as follows: MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
“That the learned Counsel for the Petitioner humbly submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled before the learned Trial Court. Therefore, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the above petition in the interest of justice and equity.”
An identical memo is also filed in W.P.No.21297/2021. Therefore, in terms of the memos, the criminal petition and the writ petition both stand disposed as withdrawn.
Pending I.As’. if any, also stand disposed, as a consequence. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 76