Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/359/2024 of SMT. T.C. MAMATHA Vs SRI.B.N. PRAVEEN on 10 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35055 CRL.RP No. 359 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 359 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. T.C. MAMATHA, W/O LATE DR. C S PRASANNA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 42
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 359 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. T.C. MAMATHA,
W/O LATE DR. C S PRASANNA KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/O OPPOSITE TO VEERABHADRESHWARA THEATER, KODLIPET TOWN, SOMWARPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571231.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI KUMAR M.B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. B.N. PRAVEEN,
S/O LATE B C NATARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/O MAIN ROAD, KODLIPET TOWN,
SOMWARPET TALUK,
KODAGU DISTRICT-571231.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR S., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401
CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT DATED
03.02.2024
IN
CRL.A.NO.108/2022
PASSED
BY
THE
PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KODAGU, AT MADIKERI AND
JUDGEMENT OF DATED 23.11.2022 PASSED BY THE SENIOR
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., SOMWARPET IN C.C.NO.330/2021
BY ALLOWING THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is listed for admission. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent is absent.
2. The Trial Court, upon considering the material available on record, particularly the admission of D.W.1 that she had received a total sum of Rs.3,95,000/- on different dates, as extracted in paragraph No.9, and her further admission that the signature on the cheque and the cheque belonged to her, convicted and sentenced the accused. The Appellate Court also having re-assessed the material available on record, confirmed the order of the Trial Court.
3. Considering the material available on record, I do not find any ground to entertain the revision petition, in view of the clear admission on the part of D.W.1 i.e., the revision petitioner herein, that she received the amount of
HC-KAR
Rs.3,95,000/- as evidenced in Ex.P.7 and not made any payment and no document is produced for having repaid the amount of Rs.3,95,000/-. Hence, the criminal revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21