Karnataka High Court
RSA/2670/2010 of SRI CHANDRA SHEKAR Vs SRI A SOMANNA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS on 10 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35137 RSA No. 2670 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2670 OF 2010 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI CHANDRA SHEKAR S/O SRI MALLANAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT BETTAHALASOOR
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2670 OF 2010 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI CHANDRA SHEKAR
S/O SRI MALLANAN
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT BETTAHALASOOR VILALGE
JALA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
BANGALORE -56
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI M SREENIVASA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI A SOMANNA
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
(A)
SMT. HAMADEVAMMA
W/O LATE A SOMANNA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
2.
SMT B R PREMKUMARI
W/O LATE BASAVARAJU
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT
BETTAHALASOOR VILLAGE
JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
BANGALORE-56
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.09.2010 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.38/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE FAST TRACK COURT, DEVANAHALLI AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
The appellant and the respondents along with their respective counsels are present.
2. The appellant and the respondents have filed compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC praying this Court to record the compromise and pass a final decree in terms of the compromise petition. In terms of the compromise, ‘A’ schedule property is a total area of the property. The appellant has agreed to given up his right measuring east to west 20 feet and north to south 90 feet towards eastern portion, in all, measuring 1800 square feet which is marked in blue colour in the sketch out of schedule ‘A’ property which is morefully described in the schedule ‘C’ given to this compromise and the appellant is retaining the remaining portion measuring east to west 30 feet and north to south 90
HC-KAR
feet towards western portion, in all, measuring 2700 square feet which is marked in yellow colour in the sketch which is morefully descried in the schedule ‘B’ given to the compromise. The sketch is also enclosed along with this compromise petition.
3. Hence, the compromise terms are understood by the parties. In view of parties have understood the terms of the compromise, compromise petition is accepted and this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived between the parties.
4. Registry is directed to draw the final decree in terms of the compromise.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN