Karnataka High Court

CCC/1014/2025 of SRI DR SADANANDA Vs Y G MADHUSUDAN on 10 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:35020-DB CCC No. 1014 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1014 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI DR. SADANANDA

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1014 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI DR. SADANANDA

S/O CHANNABASAPPA

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

R/AT OLD SITE No. 44, 45 AND 46

NEW BDA No.2078, 5TH BLOCK

NEAR CHANNAMALLAIAH BADAVANE

OPP. PARK, VISHVESHWARAIAH LAYOUT

BENGALUEU - 560 096

NOW R/AT NO.177, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS

J.B. KAVAL, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR

NANDINI LAYOUT

BENGALURU - 560 096

…COMPLAINANT

(BY SRI NATARAJ D., ADVOCATE FOR

SRI PRUTHVI WODEYAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

Y.G. MADHUSUDAN

S/O. LATE GOPALKRISHNA SHETTY

AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS

R/AT NO.46, 39TH CROSS

8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR

BANGALORE - 82

…ACCUSED

(BY SRI SAIPRAKASH V. SURYAVANSHI, ADVOCATE)

Digitally

signed by

SRIDEVI S

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF

THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO INITIATE

CONTEMPT

PROCEEDINGS

AGAINST

THE

ACCUSED

FOR

VIOLATING THE ORDER/DIRECTION DATED 10.04.2017 IN W.P.

NO.15050-15052 & 15103-15104/2017 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE

LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED 1 FOR HER

WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE, IN EXERCISE OF THE POWERS UNDER

ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 11

AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 & ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

and

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 10.04.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP.Nos.15050-15052/2017 (LA-BDA) and W.P.Nos.15103-15104/2017.

HC-KAR

2. In terms of the said interim order, the court directed that the complainant shall not be dispossessed from the property in question, if not already dispossessed. The complainant claims that he continued to be in possession of the subject property, but was dispossessed on 26.07.2025. The accused stoutly disputes the same.

3. It is the case of the accused that the property in question was allotted to the accused vide allotment letter dated 20.01.2016, and the possession certificate in respect of the same was issued on 20.02.2016. The accused has also produced the possession certificate issued by the BDA. Although the complainant claims that his furniture and belongings had been thrown out of the house and, he and his family members were forcibly evicted. There is no material produced to establish the same. The complainant has produced photographs, which were filed in the writ petition. These photographs indicate that the details of the writ petition had been painted on the walls of the property in question. The complainant has also produced photographs, which he claims are recent, showing that the outer walls have been repainted, thus, removing the references of the High Court writ petition and the stay order.

HC-KAR

However, these photographs also indicate that some of the walls still refer to the details of the writ petition.

4. We are unable to ascertain from the material on record whether the complainant has been dispossessed after the order dated 10.04.2017.

5. We are informed that the writ petition is listed before the court next week. We close the present complaint while reserving the complainant all rights and contentions in the pending proceedings.

Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE SD, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead