Karnataka High Court
WA/1454/2024 of STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs SRI U VASULINGAPPA on 10 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35015-DB WA No. 1454 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT APPEAL NO.1454 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: STATE BANK OF INDIA ASSET
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:35015-DB
WA No. 1454 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT APPEAL NO.1454 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
STATE BANK OF INDIA
ASSET RECOVER MANAGEMENT BRANCH
2ND FLOOR, A BLOCK, BKG COMPLEX,
MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, AVENUE ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560009
(NOW STRESSED ASSETS
RECOVERY BRANCH HUBBALLI)
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER
AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER
MR. S.E. RAVIKUMAR.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHETTY VIGNESH SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
SRI. U. VASULINGAPPA
S/O LATE RUDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
PROPRIETOR OF M/S. RAGHAVENDRA RICE MILL
NO.986, NEW DAROJI,
SANDUR TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT,
BELLARY-583121.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M.S. CHANDRASHEKAR BABU, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE
WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.09.2024
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:35015-DB
WA No. 1454 of 2024
PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE
COURT IN W.P.NO.19203/2024.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. None appears for the appellant. However, the learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the parties have resolved the dispute amicably. Hence, the present appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
2. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. The pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
MBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15