Karnataka High Court
CCC/735/2026 of DEEP RAJ S AMBAT Vs RAVICHANDRA NAIK on 10 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35016-DB CCC No. 735 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.735 OF 2026 BETWEEN: DEEP RAJ S. AMBAT S/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.735 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
DEEP RAJ S. AMBAT
S/O SHASHIRAJ,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/AT RAJ MAHAL,
VENKAPPA SHETTY ROAD,
VIJAYANAGAR, ALAPE POST,
BAJAL, MANGALORE,
D.K.-575007.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
RAVICHANDRA NAIK
THE COMMISSIONER
MANGALORE CITY CORPORATION,
LAL BHAG, M.G.ROAD,
MANGALORE TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA-575003.
2.
AKSHATHA
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)
MANGALORE CITY CORPORATION,
LAL BHAG, M.G. ROAD,
MANGALORE TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA -575003.
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
3.
BABITHA ROHINATH
W/O ROHINATH,
MAJOR,
R/O PREMIER SECURITY SERVICES,
M.G.ROAD, MANGALORE TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA -575003.
…ACCUSED
4.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU
KARNATAKA-560 001.
…PRO FORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT
ADVOCATE FOR PRO FORMA RESPONDENT NO.4)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED
NOS.1, 2 AND 3 FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER
PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT 29.04.2026 PASSED IN
W.P.NO.13033/2026 AS PER ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the interim order dated 29.04.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.13033/2026 (GM-TEN). By the said order, the learned Single Judge had stayed an allotment order dated 10.04.2026, which was impugned in the said petition.
2. It is relevant to note that, in terms of the allotment order dated 10.04.2026, the subject property (Shop No.6A located in Lalbagh Commercial Complex) was allotted to accused No.3 (Smt. Babitha Rohinath, M/s. Premier Security Services). The order also indicates that accused No.3 was a tenant in the subject property and had been allotted the subject property in her favour, as she had reserved the "Right of First Refusal".
3. The complainant submits that despite the said order staying the allotment, accused No.3 continues to remain in possession of the subject property.
4. We are unable to accept the contention that the continued possession of subject property by accused No.3 constitutes willful
HC-KAR
disobedience of the interim order passed by the Court. The present complaint is, therefore, misconceived and is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
MBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7