Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1573/2024 of T M GOVINDA Vs RAMAIAH on 10 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35050 CRL.RP No. 1573 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1573 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. T.M. GOVINDA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O MARIGOWDA, R/AT No.108/1, NEAR
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:35050
CRL.RP No. 1573 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1573 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
T.M. GOVINDA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
S/O MARIGOWDA,
R/AT No.108/1,
NEAR SUBRAMANYA TEMPLE,
CHANNANAYAKANAPALYA,
WEST OF CHORD ROAD,
NAGASANDRA,
BANGALORE-560 073.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RISHI N. UMESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
RAMAIAH,
S/O LATE BYRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT No.45, MUNESHWAR EXTENSION,
DODDABIDARAKAL,
NAGASANDRA POST,
BANGALORE-560 073.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401
CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 01.10.2024 PASSED IN
CRL.A.NO.181/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE LXI ADDITIONAL
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-62) AND
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:35050
CRL.RP No. 1573 of 2024
ALSO MAY SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED
06.02.2021 PASSED IN C.C.NO.14863/2016 ON THE COURT OF
THE JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND A.C.M.M, (SCCH-
09), BENGALURU AND THEREBY DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN C.C.NO.14863/2016.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition on the ground that the matter is settled between the parties.
2. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24