Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/419/2023 of K S SHREEDHAR BHAT Vs SURESH KUMAR G S on 10 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35134 CRL.RP No. 419 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.419 OF 2023 BETWEEN: K S SHREEDHAR BHAT S/O SHESHAGIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS OCC
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:35134
CRL.RP No. 419 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.419 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
K S SHREEDHAR BHAT
S/O SHESHAGIRIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
OCC AGRICULTURIST
R/O KODANANKATTE
HOSABALE POST
SORAB TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA-577434
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRABHU PUJAR S, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
SURESH KUMAR G S
S/O SUBHASHCHANDRA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
OCC AGRICULTURIST
R/O KAGODU VILLAGE
SAGAR TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA-577434
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. ASHWATH C.M., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
29.04.2019
PASSED
BY
THE
LEARNED
V
ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA, SITTING AT
SAGAR IN CRL.A.NO.10032/2018 AND ETC.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:35134
CRL.RP No. 419 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is called twice i.e., in the morning session and also in the afternoon session. But there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On perusal of the records, it disclose that there is a delay of 1398 days in filing the revision petition and the counsel for the petitioner is not appeared before the Court to convince this delay. The matter was earlier referred to the Mediation, but, the parties did not appear before the mediation also within the statutory period. When there is an inordinate delay of 1398 days delay in filing the petition and the counsel for the petitioner is not pursuing the matter diligently from 2023, the question of keeping the petition pending does not arise. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN