Karnataka High Court
CSTA/5/2022 of PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Vs SRI NAZHAR AHMED on 9 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:34810-DB CSTA No. 5 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO C.S.T.A NO. 5 OF 2022 BETWEEN: PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS CUSTOMS, AP AND
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:34810-DB
CSTA No. 5 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
C.S.T.A NO. 5 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CUSTOMS, AP AND ACC,
COMMISSIONERATE, BENGALURU.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN, ADV. – (ABSENT))
AND:
SRI NAZHAR AHMED
MOULANA MANZIL,
MUSLIM MOHALLA,
SHIROOR, KUNDAPURA.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. HIREMATH SIDDALINGAYYA SHARANAYYA, ADV.)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.130 OF THE CUSTOMS
ACT, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 15/02/2022 PASSED IN FINAL
ORDER NO.A/20034/2022 BY THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE
TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, BENGALURU, PRAYING TO I) TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL ORDER NO.A/20034/2022
DATED 15/02/2022 PASSED BY THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND
SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-A BY; II) HOLDING THAT THE APPEAL
BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS NOT MAINTAINABLE BY ALLOWING THIS
CUSTOMS APPEAL WITH EXEMPLARY COSTS AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by
NANJUNDACHARI
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:34810-DB
CSTA No. 5 of 2022
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
None appears for the appellant.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49