Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/188/2024 of SRI. K. P. BABU Vs SRI. RUDRASWAMY on 9 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:35061 CRL.RP No. 188 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 188 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K. P. BABU S/O. K. B. PANDURANGA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 188 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. K. P. BABU
S/O. K. B. PANDURANGA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/AT NO.1633,AGS LAYOUT,
4TH CROSS, NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL,
RAGHAVENDRA MUTT ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 009.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAIK RAMACHANDRA RAMA,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. RUDRASWAMY
S/O. G. M. MAHANTHAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RAT NO. 40/19, ADAVI
AMARESHAWAR NILAYA,
RAGHAVENDRA COLONY,
CHAMARAJPET,BENGALURU SOUTH,
BENGALURU-560 018.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. JAVEED S,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY
THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT
THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE
ABOVE
REVISION
PETITION
AND
SET
ASIDE
THE
JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 04.07.2023 PASSED BY
THE LEARNED VII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE
AND
ACMM
AND
MACT
AT
BENGALURU
IN
C.C.NO.8865/2021 WHICH IS CONFIRMED IN JUDGMETN
AND ORDER DATED 07.11.2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED
LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT
BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.1067/2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORTING
SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Both the parties are present before this Court with their respective counsels.
2. Parties have filed the joint memo and in the joint memo, it is stated that matter was compromised out of Court. The revision petitioner has paid the entire amount to the respondent. In terms of the settlement, the respondent has no objection with regard to releasing of amount in deposit before the trial Court in favour of the revision petitioner herein.
HC-KAR
3. In view of the settlement arrived between the parties and having acknowledged the entire amount by the respondent, the revision petition is disposed of and also the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court is set aside. Consequently, the revision petitioner is acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46