Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/61/2026 of RENUKA. T. N. Vs SMT. UMA on 9 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:34652 CRL.RP No. 61 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.61 OF 2026 BETWEEN: RENUKA T N AGE ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O SRI SHIVA MURTHY R/AT NO.36, C/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.61 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
RENUKA T N
AGE ABOUT 56 YEARS
W/O SRI SHIVA MURTHY
R/AT NO.36, C/O BASAPPASWAMY
NO.01, 1ST MAIN, 1ST BLOCK
BYRASANDRA, EAST JAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560011
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN C, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. UMA
AGE ABOUT 56 YEARS
W/O MEHRARAM
R/AT NO.45/17, GROUND FLOOR
5TH CROSS, 19TH MAIN
MUNESHWARA BLOCK
BENGALURU - 560026
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED
U/S 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 22.11.2025 PASSED IN CRL.A
NO.1073/2023 BY THE LVIII ADDL.,DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AT BENGALURU CITY AND ETC.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
I.A.No.3/2026 is filed by the counsel for the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 14.01.2026 wherein it is stated that whether payment of 50% is a fine amount or a cheque amount.
2. The order dated 14.01.2026 is very clear that sentence is suspended for the petitioner subject to depositing of 50% of the fine amount inclusive of the amount already deposited if any before the Trial Court. When there is a clear order that sentence is suspended subject to payment of 50% of the fine amount, modification of the said order does not arise. Accordingly, I.A.No.3/2026 is rejected.
3. On perusal of the records, it discloses that this Court vide order dated 14.01.2026 suspended the sentence of the petitioner passing conditional order. But till date, the petitioner has not complied with the said order. On 26.02.2026
HC-KAR
also, this Court extended the time for three weeks for compliance of the order dated 14.01.2026. Even though the conditional order was passed in the month of January 2026 and extension also granted in the month of February 2026, I.A.No.3/2026 is filed in the month of May 2026 seeking modification of the order dated 14.01.2026. The counsel for the petitioner also submits that DD is already taken in the month of March 2026 itself. This discloses that till date, the conditional order is not complied. The revision petition is also not yet admitted. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- compliance of order dated 14.01.2026.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN