Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10619/2023 of STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs SMT CELESTINE D MELLO on 9 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:34709 CRL.P No. 10619 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10619 OF 2023 BETWEEN: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BANTWAL CITY POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:34709
CRL.P No. 10619 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10619 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BANTWAL CITY POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 1.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP)
AND:
1.
SMT. CELESTINE D'MELLO
C/O CYRIL D'MELL
AGED ABOUT MAJOR,
R/AT JORDAN VIEW,
LORETTO HOUSE, KASABA,
BANTWAL TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 153.
2.
CYRIL D MELLO
AGED ABOUT MAJOR,
R/AT JORDAN VIEW,
LORETTO HOUSE, KASABA,
BANTWAL TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 153
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HAREESH T. BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:34709
CRL.P No. 10619 of 2023
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12.04.2023 PASSED BY THE
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K. IN SPL.CASE
NO.87/2019.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The State is before the Court calling in question the application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The trial itself is concluded, as on today.
2. In that light, the petition stands disposed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39