Karnataka High Court

CRL.RP/1390/2025 of ONDATH KUNHAMMAD Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 8 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:34333 CRL.RP No. 1390 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1390 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. ONDATH KUNHAMMAD S/O ABDULLA ONDATH KAIVELIKKAL AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:34333

CRL.RP No. 1390 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1390 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

1.

ONDATH KUNHAMMAD

S/O ABDULLA ONDATH

KAIVELIKKAL

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

R/AT PUTHUR-PANOOR DIST.

KANNUR, KERALA - 670 692

2.

TANVEER KHAN

S/O YUSAF KHAN

AGED 42 YEARS

R/AT NO.58, 4TH CROSS

‘A’ BLOCK, NEAR ANGAWADI

RAINBOW LAYOUT, VADERAHALLI

VIDYARAYAPURA POST

BANGALORE, BANGALORE NORTH

KARNATAKA – 560097

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. S SHANKARAPPA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

THROUGH BELLANDUR PS

REP. BY SPP

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

COMPLEX, KARNATAKA – 560001

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:34333

CRL.RP No. 1390 of 2025

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C

PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.08.2024 IN

SC.NO.1519/2018 (ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.52/2018 OF

BELLANDUR PS) BEFORE THE LII ADDL. CITY CIVIL COURT

AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE FOR OFFENCES P/U/S.

268, 288, 337, 338, 304 R/W 34 OF THE IPC AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition on the ground that the petitioner intends to pursue the matter in the Trial Court and conclude the trial. The said memo is taken on record. In view of the said memo, the counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

SN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead