Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1070/2026 of STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs MOHAMMED ISMAIL on 8 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:34284 CRL.RP No. 1070 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1070 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MANGALURU SOUTH POLICE STATION, REP. BY STATE
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:34284
CRL.RP No. 1070 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1070 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY MANGALURU SOUTH POLICE STATION,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU-01.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)
AND:
1.
MOHAMMED ISMAIL
S/O. ZABIULLA,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
R/AT UMRI MOHALLA, AZAD CHAWK,
DONABAGHATTA, BHADRAVATHI TALUK,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 229.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE
PETITIONER -STATE AND ADDL.STATE PPPRAYING THAT THIS
HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 30.12.2025 PASSED IN SPL.C.NO.124/2025 ON
THE FILE OF THE COURT OFT HE ADDL.DIST. AND SESSIONS
JUDGE / FTSC-II POCSO) D.K MANGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE
P/U/S 137(2),65(1) OF BNS 2023 AND SEC.4 OF POCSO ACT
2012 BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:34284
CRL.RP No. 1070 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has made oral submission with regard to permitting him to withdraw the revision petition with a liberty to file an appeal.
2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, permission is granted to withdraw the revision petition with a liberty to file an appeal. Accordingly, the revision stands dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Registry is directed to return the certified copies to the learned counsel for the revision petitioner.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7