Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/927/2026 of SRI KUMAR R N Vs DR M MUNIRAJU on 7 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33893 CRL.RP No. 927 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.927 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. KUMAR R.N., S/O. LATE R. NANJUNDA SHASTRY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.927 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. KUMAR R.N.,
S/O. LATE R. NANJUNDA SHASTRY,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT NO.17/3, 13TH CROSS,
KODANDARAMAPURAM,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560 055.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RUDRAPPA P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
DR. M. MUNIRAJU,
S/O. LATE MUTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/AT NO.2200,
15TH ‘B’ CROSS, 22ND MAIN,
1ST SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU-560 102,
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SAMARTH M. RAJU, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF
CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGEMENT AND ORDER PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.69/2024 ON
THE FILE OF THE LXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-63) DATED 07.11.2025 AND SET
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
ASIDE
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGEMENT
AND CONVICTION
ORDER
IN CC.NO.4735/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ACMM AT BENGALURU, DATED 10.10.2023.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
This matter is listed for consideration of I.A.No.2/2026 for condonation of delay of 123 days in filing the petition.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent brought to the notice of this Court that the matter was disposed of by the Trial Court based on the joint memo on 10.10.2023, wherein the petitioner agreed to pay an amount of Rs.4,00,000/-. The same was challenged before the First Appellate Court and the First Appellate Court confirmed the order of the Trial Court on the ground that liability is admitted based on the joint memo.
3. This revision petition is filed against the order of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court. The revision petitioner admitted his liability in 2023 agreeing to pay an amount of Rs.4,00,000/-, but did not pay the amount and challenged the same before the First Appellate Court.
HC-KAR
4. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- was paid and remaining amount of Rs.2,00,000/- is not paid.
5. When the matter was disposed of by the Trial Court based on the joint memo, the question of considering the matter in the revision petition does not arise. Hence, no ground is made out either to condone the delay or to entertain the criminal revision petition. Hence, the criminal revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10