Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/472/2026 of SRI VAGEESHA J P Vs SRI S K MURULIDHAR on 7 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:34281 CRL.RP No. 472 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 472 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI VAGEESHA J P S/O. SRI. PARAMESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 472 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI VAGEESHA J P
S/O. SRI. PARAMESHWARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/O. EDAGUDDE JAMBALLI,
HUMCHA HOBLI,
HOSANAGARA TALUK-577 436.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H S PRASHANTH,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI S K MURULIDHAR
S/O. SRI. KRISHNAIAH SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
OCCU AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. SHETTIBIDU,KOTETARIGA,
HOSANAGARA TALUK-572 134.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K PRASANNA SHETTY,ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438
R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER
PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED
TO A) SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.10.2023 PASSED
BY THE 5TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA SITTING AT SAGARA IN CRL.A. NO.10023/2023, WHEREBY THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN
DISMISSED AND THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
SENTENCE DATED 15.03.2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSANAGARA IN C.C.NO.2411/2021 HAS
BEEN CONFIRMED AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter was listed before this Court on 19.06.2026 wherein this Court made it clear that as the matter was called twice, there was no representation of revision petitioner in the morning session and also in the afternoon session. However,in the ends of justice, one more opportunity was given to the revision petitioner to pursue the matter and also to make submission whether the conditional order of this Court is complete or not. It is also made clear that if the counsel fails to appear on the next date of hearing and fails to pursue the matter, the petition will be dismissed. In spite of this, revision petitioner remained absent today also and not pursued the matter. Further, he was not made any submission whether the conditional order was complied or not and
HC-KAR
whether the bond was executed as required under Section 436A of Cr.PC. Under the circumstances, I do not find any ground to admit the revision and accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40