Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1269/2025 of SAMEENA BEGUM Vs PREETHAM KUMAR SHETTY on 6 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33534 CRL.RP No. 1269 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1269 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SAMEENA BEGUM W/O. MOHAMMED ASLAM BOLAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT. FLAT
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:33534
CRL.RP No. 1269 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1269 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
SAMEENA BEGUM
W/O. MOHAMMED ASLAM BOLAR
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT. FLAT NO.504
MARIAN PROMENADE APARTMENTS
KADRI KAMBALA ROAD
KADRI, TALUK MANAGALURU
D.K DISTRICT, PIN-571 105.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PATGAR NARENDRA HANUMANT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
PREETHAM KUMAR SHETTY
S/O. M.J. SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
PROP: RISHITH FINANCE AND SERVICES,
NO.6, DOOR NO.14-1-81/14, TRADE CENTRE
JYOTHI BUNTS HOSTEL RAO, MANGALURU
REP. BY HIS G.P.A HOLDER/ACCOUNTANT
MISS. DIVYA K, D/O. DEEKAYYA POOHARY
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
R/AT NO.12-116, ASHRAYA COLONY
RAJEEVA NAGAR, SHAKTHINAGAR
MANGALURU, D.K-575 016.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:33534
CRL.RP No. 1269 of 2025
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W OF 401
CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND ORDER OF SENTENCE
PASSED IN C.C.NO.1483/2021 DATED 01.06.2024 ON THE FILE
OF THE J.M.F.C (V COURT) MANGALURU, D.K., AND SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION ORDER IN CRL.A.
NO.145/2024 DATED 25.02.2025 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE
II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K. MANGALURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the revision petition, as the parties have settled the matter out of Court.
2. The memo is taken on record.
In terms of the memo, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending I.As., if any do not survive for consideration.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18