Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1754/2025 of SMT KOMALA Vs SRI C S RAVI on 6 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33658 CRL.RP No. 1754 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1754 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. KOMALA W/O SRI. SARAVANAN K AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.10/2, K.S.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1754 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SMT. KOMALA
W/O SRI. SARAVANAN K
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT NO.10/2, K.S. NILAYA
N.R. THIRUMALA VIDEO CABLES
10TH CROSS, MAGADI ROAD
BENGALURU – 560023
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NELADURGA S VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI C S RAVI
S/O LATE SIDDAIAH @ CHINNAPPA
AGED MAJOR
R/AT NO.26, 2ND MAIN ROAD
KOTTEGEPALYA
NEAR NEW GOLDEN PG
AND NANDINI MILK PARLOR
MAGADI MAIN ROAD
BENGALURU-560072
ALSO AT: NO.6, 5TH MAIN ROAD
NEAR MAHARAJA ENCLAVE
SVG NAGAR, BENGALURU-560072
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRADEEP M, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION
AND SENTENCE DATED 10.09.2025 PASSED BY THE LXIX
ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN
CRL.A.NO.1624/2024 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The order of this Court dated 18.06.2026 reads as follows: “Heard the learned counsel for the respondent and counsel for the petitioner is absent. This Court suspended the sentence by passing a conditional order. On 19.02.2026, when the counsel for the respondent submits that conditional order of this Court has not been complied by the petitioner, this Court directed the Magistrate to proceed against the petitioner for execution of order of sentence in accordance with law. The counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that consequently, the warrant was issued and when the warrant was executed, the amount was deposited before the Court that is entire amount of fine imposed by the Trial Court. The records also disclose that the matter is listed before this Court subsequently after
HC-KAR
depositing the amount and today, no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that in view of depositing of the entire amount, the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. However, in the ends of justice, one more opportunity is given to the petitioner counsel to pursue the matter. If the counsel for the petitioner does not appear on the next date of hearing, petition will be dismissed.”
2. Inspite of the aforesaid order, today also, the counsel for the petitioner is absent. Hence, in view of the order dated 18.06.2026, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN