Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/616/2026 of SRI UMESH Vs SMT. H S ASHA on 6 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33663 CRL.RP No. 616 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.616 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI UMESH S/O THIMAPPA AGE ABOUT 44 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF M/S C.V.DEVELOPERS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.616 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI UMESH
S/O THIMAPPA
AGE ABOUT 44 YEARS
PROPRIETOR OF M/S C.V.DEVELOPERS
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.1
’A’ FIRST FLOOR
JAKKUR MAIN ROAD
AMRUTHAHALLI
BANGALORE - 560092
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PREMAKUMAR B, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
SMT. H S ASHA
W/O H HARISH
AGE ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/O RAGHAVENDRANILAYA
NO.04, 6TH CROSS
C B NAGARAHA UPPARAHALLI
BENGALURU - 560006
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. AJAY T, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DTD
25.02.2025 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND III
JMFC, TUMAKURU, IN C.C. NOS.1616/2020, 1617/2020 AND
1618/2020 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed on 09.04.2026. On 17.04.2026, this Court issued emergent notice to the respondent. On 02.06.2026, this Court, in the absence of the counsel for the petitioner also considered the application for condonation of delay of 64 days in filing the revision petition and allowed the said application and posted the matter for admission along with I.A.No.2/2026. On 17.06.2026, the matter was called twice but no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, one more opportunity was given to the counsel for the petitioner to assist the Court and also made it clear that, if
HC-KAR
the counsel for the petitioner does not appear on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed. Inspite of the said order, today also the counsel for the petitioner is absent. Hence, in terms of the order dated 17.06.2026, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN