Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1011/2026 of SRI SIDDARAJU K Vs SRI VENKATASUBRAHMANYA K J on 6 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33541 CRL.RP No. 1011 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1011 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SIDDARAJU K S/O KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT NO.678, 2ND
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1011 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SIDDARAJU K
S/O KARIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT NO.678, 2ND CROSS
SRS HOOTAGALLI
MYSURU-570018.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M.C.ROSHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. VENKATASUBRAHMANYA K.J.,
S/O JAYARAMU K.R.
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.730,
NEXT TO KERALAPURA ABHIRUCHI HOTEL
SUPRIYA HOSPITAL ROAD, HINKAL
MYSURU-570 030.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S
438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT
OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DTD 28.08.2025 PASSED BY
THE LEARNED V JMFC, MYSURU IN CC.NO.461/2025 AND
JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DTD 13.02.2026 PASSED BY THE
HONBLE 1ST ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
IN CRL.A.NO.325/2025.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on I.A.Nos.1/2026 and there is a delay of 32 days in filing the revision petition and also on I.A.No.2/2026 for suspension of sentence.
2. On perusal of paragraph No.14 of judgment of the Trial Court, it is seen that matter was settled and a joint memo was filed settling the matter for an amount of Rs.5,00,000/-. Out of the amount of Rs.5,00,000/-, the accused has paid Rs.2,00,000/- and remaining amount of Rs.3,00,000/- was not paid. Hence, judgment was passed by the Trial Court.
3. Having considered the joint memo and matter is settled for an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and only part payment was made, conviction was made by the Trial Court for Rs.3,00,000/- for default clause. When such being the case, I do not find any ground to entertain this revision petition.
HC-KAR
Hence, I.A.Nos.1/2026 and are dismissed. Consequently, the revision petition is also dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19