Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1757/2025 of SRI SARAVANAN K Vs SRI C S RAVI on 6 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33659 CRL.RP No. 1757 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1757 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI SARAVANAN K S/O KOTHANDAN M AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT 10/2, K.S.NILAYA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1757 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI SARAVANAN K
S/O KOTHANDAN M
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
R/AT 10/2, K.S.NILAYA
N.R.THIRUMALA VIDEO CABLES
10TH CROSS, MAGADI ROAD
BEGALURU-560023
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NELADURGA S VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI C S RAVI
S/O LATE SIDDAIAH @ CHINNAPPA
AGED MAJOR
R/AT NO.26, 2ND MAIN ROAD
KOTTEGEPALYA
NEAR NEW GOLDEN PG
AND NANDINI MILK PARLOR
MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560072
ALSO AT: NO.6, 5TH MAIN ROAD
NEAR MAHARAJA ENCLAVE
SVG NAGAR, BENGALURU-560072
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRADEEP M, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 438 R/W 442 OF BNSS, 2023
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 10.09.2025 PASSED BY
THE
LXIX
ADDL.CITY
CIVIL
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
BENGALURU (CCH-70) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1623/2024
AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The order of this Court dated 18.06.2026 reads as follows: “Heard the learned counsel for the respondent and counsel for the petitioner is absent. This Court suspended the sentence by passing a conditional order. On 19.02.2026, when the counsel for the respondent submits that conditional order of this Court has not been complied by the petitioner, this Court directed the Magistrate to proceed against the petitioner for execution of order of sentence in accordance with law. The counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that consequently, the warrant was issued and when the warrant was executed, the amount was deposited before the Court that is entire amount of fine imposed by the Trial Court. The records also disclose that
HC-KAR
the matter is listed before this Court subsequently after depositing the amount and today, no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that in view of depositing of the entire amount, the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. However, in the ends of justice, one more opportunity is given to the petitioner counsel to pursue the matter. If the counsel for the petitioner does not appear on the next date of hearing, petition will be dismissed.”
2. Inspite of aforesaid order, today also, the counsel for the petitioner is absent. Hence, in view of the order dated 18.06.2026, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN