Karnataka High Court
MFA/8877/2025 of SRI. SANTANU KUMAR PATNAIK Vs MS. ARCHANA MATHUR on 6 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33853-DB MFA No. 8877 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8877 OF 2025 (FC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SANTANU KUMAR PATNAIK
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:33853-DB
MFA No. 8877 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8877 OF 2025 (FC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SANTANU KUMAR PATNAIK
S/O KAMALAKANTA
R/AT SECTOR A. HOUSE NO. 1
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
DOIMUKH, RONA HILLA ITANAGAR,
PAPUM PARE,
ARUNACHAL PRADESH-791112
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRATAP KUMAR V., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
MS. ARCHANA MATHUR
R/AT HOUSE NO.426, 4TH B CROSS
7TH B MAIN, HRBR LAYOUT
BLOCK-1, KALYANANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560043
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. R.KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY
COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED.
17.07.2025 PASSED IN MC NO.2169/2015 ON THE FILE OF
THE PRL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 25 OF THE
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B
K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:33853-DB
MFA No. 8877 of 2025
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
None appeared for the appellant in the first call or in the revised call to press this appeal.
2. It appears the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
3. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
SD/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
NG CT: SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10