Karnataka High Court
RP/7/2025 of SRI. B S NAGENDRA Vs SMT. T VENKATALAKSHMI on 3 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33164 RP No. 7 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 7 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. B S NAGENDRA S/O LATE B. SHESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, PREVIOUSLY RESIDING AT
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:33164
RP No. 7 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REVIEW PETITION NO. 7 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI. B S NAGENDRA
S/O LATE B. SHESHAGIRI RAO,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
PREVIOUSLY RESIDING AT NO.1897,
7TH MAIN, E BLOCK, II STAGE,
RAJAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560010.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.19, 1ST FLOOR,
BETWEEN 6TH AND 7TH MAIN, AECS LAYOUT,
NEAR SHIKSHA SAGAR SCHOOL,
SANJAYNAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560094.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DHANUSH GOWDA B., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. SHANKAREGOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. T VENKATALAKSHMI
DAUGHTER OF LATE SRI THIRUMALAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.10, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
BYRAVESHWARANAGAR,
NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE.
…RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE
1 R/W SEC. 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO 1.CALL FOR RECORDS IN
MFA NO.1311/2024(CPC) PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT
VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 10.12.2024. 2.REVIEW THE ORDER
DATED 10.12.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN MFA
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:33164
RP No. 7 of 2025
NO.1311/2024(CPC) AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE MFA
NO.1311/2024. 3.AND GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS
HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF
THE CASE TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of this review petition. Memo is accepted. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file the same before the appropriate forum. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
DS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58