Karnataka High Court

WP/18035/2026 of MRS GEETHA MISRA Vs THE CHIEF SECRETARY on 3 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:33278-DB WP No. 18035 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 18035 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MRS GEETHA MISRA PANEL ADVOCATE,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

WRIT PETITION NO. 18035 OF 2026 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

MRS GEETHA MISRA

PANEL ADVOCATE,

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,

D/O LATE SRI KAILASHNATH MISRA,

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

R/A 135, 3RD BLOCK,

RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560010.

…PETITIONER

(BY MRS. GEETHA MISRA, PARTY-IN-PERSON FOR PETITIONER)

AND:

1.

THE CHIEF SECRETARY

STATE OF KARNATAKA,

VIDHANA SOUDHA, PALACE ROAD,

BANGALORE-560001.

2.

THE JOINT SECRETARY AND CHAIRMAN,

AWBI, (ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD OF INDIA)

MINISTRY OF FISHERIES ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

AND DAIRYING, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.

3.

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DEPUTY

COMMISSIONER,

BENGALURU URBAN,

BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN

4.

THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER,

Digitally

signed by

VASANTHA

KUMARY B K

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

GREATER BANGALORE AUTHORITY,

K R CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560001.

5.

THE COMMISSIONER,

BANGALORE CENTRAL CITY CORPORATION,

10TH FLOOR, MULTIPURPOSE PU BUILDING,

MG ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.

6.

THE CHAIRMAN,

KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PARISARA BHAVAN, 49 CHURCH STREET, BANGALORE-560001.

7.

THE COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE EAST CITY CORPORATION,

RHB COLONY, OPPOSITE PHOENIX MALL,

WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD,

MAHADEVAPURA POST,

BANGALORE -560048.

8.

THE COMMISSIONER,

BANGALORE WEST CITY CORPORATION,

18TH CROSS ROAD,

IDEAL HOMES TOWNSHIP,

RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR,

BANGALORE -560098.

9.

THE COMMISSIONER,

BANGALORE NORTH CITY CORPORATION,

BYATARAYANAPURA,

AMRUTHHALLI MAIN ROAD,

BELLARY ROAD,

BANGALORE-560092.

10.

THE COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE SOUTH CITY CORPORATION,

9TH MAIN ROAD, 9TH CROSS ROAD,

2ND STAGE JAYNAGAR,

BANGALORE-560011

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. S.H.PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R4, R5, R7, R8, R9,

HC-KAR

R10, R6;

SRI. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO

ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTIONS TO THE

RESPONDENTS THAT SHELTERS FOR INSTITUTIONAL DOGS BE

CONSTRUCTED IN THE CITY OF BANGALORE AND ALL OVER

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, IN APPROPRIATE PLACES AFTER

TAKING PERMISSIONS FROM THE CONCERNED STATUTORY

AUTHORITIES, CONSTRUCTING LEGAL INFRASTRUCTURE IN

ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF WATER ACT, AIR ACT, ENVIRONMENT ACT, NOISE POLLUTION RULES AND FIRE

SAFETY RULES, AND MODIFYING THE DESIGN OF THE

COMMUNITY

KENNEL/CAGE,

IN

COMPLIANCE

WITH

DIRECTIONS OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT, IN PARA 102

IN SUO MOTO WP CIVIL 05/2025 AT ANNEXURE A ORDER

DATED 19/05/2026, ETC.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present writ petition is filed by Ms. Geetha Misra, party-in-person (petitioner) alleging that the dogs shelters have been constructed in compliance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No.5/2025. According to the petitioner, the construction undertaken by the

HC-KAR

State and the Municipal Authorities is not as per the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the said order.

2. The following directions have been issued by the Supreme Court: A. For the purpose of ongoing compliance and monitoring, all High Courts are directed to register a suo moto writ petition, in the name and style of: "In Re: Compliance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No(s). 5 of 2025", as a continuing mandamus, for monitoring compliance with the directions issued by this Court vide orders dated 22nd August, 2025 and 7th November, 2025, in addition to the directions contained in the present order, and the same shall be placed before and, as far as practicable, taken up by a Division Bench of the concerned High Court.

B. The Registry of this Court is directed to forthwith transmit a copy of the present order, as well as the orders dated 11th August, 2025, 22nd August, 2025 and 7th November, 2025, to the Registrar Generals of all the jurisdictional High Courts, for the purpose of ensuring effective compliance, implementation and monitoring of the directions issued therein.

C. While ensuring full compliance with the directions issued by this Court, the concerned Bench of the High Court shall be at liberty to expand or tailor the scope of

HC-KAR

such directions, as may be necessary to address local conditions and exigencies, without in any manner diluting the tenor and intent of the directions issued by this Court.

D. It is made clear that any continued failure or deliberate non-compliance with the directions issued by this Court, including the directions contained in the orders dated 22nd August, 2025, 7th November, 2025 and the present order, shall render the erring officials of the municipal department, administrative authorities and the officials of the concerned departments of the States and Union Territories liable to appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. The jurisdictional High Courts, while undertaking the monitoring exercise in terms of the present order, shall be fully empowered to take appropriate action, including initiation of contempt proceedings, against the erring officials responsible for non-compliance, inaction or wilful disregard of the directions issued by this Court.

E. The Chief Secretaries and the Secretaries of the relevant departments of all the States and Union Territories shall file their updated affidavits of compliance before the respective jurisdictional High Courts on or before 7th August, 2026. Likewise, the Union of India and the National Highways Authority of India shall also file their respective affidavits of compliance before the jurisdictional High Courts, in relation to areas falling within their respective domain, within the aforesaid

HC-KAR

period, clearly indicating the measures undertaken in compliance with the directions issued by this Court.

F. The Registry of this Court is directed to forthwith transmit the records of all transferred cases/applications to the respective jurisdictional High Courts, and the matters so transmitted shall be appropriately tagged and heard along with the suo moto writ petition to be registered by the High Courts in terms of Direction (A) above.

G. The High Courts, through their respective Registrars General, shall compile and forward a consolidated report to this Court every four months, summarising the status of compliance by States and Union Territories, the progress achieved, best practices identified, and persistent gaps requiring policy or judicial intervention. The first such consolidated report shall be placed on record before this Court at least one week prior to the next date of hearing, i.e., 17th November, 2026.

112. The Registry is directed to forthwith transmit a copy of this order to the Chief Secretaries of all States and Union Territories, as well as to the Union of India through the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the National Highways Authority of India, to ensure due compliance with the directions issued herein.

HC-KAR

3. The matter has been directed to be listed before the Supreme Court on 17.11.2026 for consideration of the consolidated compliance reports to be forwarded by the High Courts through their respective Registrars General and for further directions.

4. As the matter is still sub judice before the Supreme Court and the compliance reports are to be forwarded by the respective High Courts, we cannot pass any order at this stage on the writ petition filed by Smt. Geetha Misra, party-in-person. The High Court is yet to registered suo moto writ petition in pursuance of the directions issued by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court itself is presently monitoring the compliance of the directions issued vide order dated 19.05.2026.

5. Be that as it may, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the non compliance of the order passed by the Supreme Court by the State and Municipal Authorities, the petitioner may either intervene in the suo moto writ petition or approach the Supreme Court by filing an application as may be advised. However, we cannot pass any directions at this stage. We,

HC-KAR

therefore, dispose of this writ petition with liberty as stated above.

Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead