Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/239/2026 of SRI T S BASAVARAJU Vs SMT H G SAVITHA on 3 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33169 CRL.RP No. 239 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.239 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T S BASAVARAJU S/O LATE SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT BEHIND
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.239 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. T S BASAVARAJU
S/O LATE SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT BEHIND SHISHUVIHARA,
THOTADASALU, AGRAHARA,
TUMAKURU TOWN,
TUMAKURU TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572107.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. H G SAVITHA
W/O NARENDRABABU,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT VEERABHADRASWAMY KRUPA,
3RD LINK ROAD, 9TH CROSS,
S.I.T. EXTENSION,
TUMAKURU.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S
438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT
PASSED BY VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
SPECIAL JUDGE, AT TUMAKURU IN CRL.A.NO.61/2025 DTD
29.10.2025
AND THE JUDGEMENT IN CC.NO.4099/2017
PASSED BY THE V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND VI JMFC, AT
TUMAKURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard on I.A.No.3/2026 wherein prayer is sought for extension of time.
2. This Court vide order dated 25.02.2026 directed the petitioner to deposit 40% of the fine amount inclusive of the amount, if any, already deposited within a period of six weeks. This application is filed on 30.04.2026 for an extension of time once again seeking six weeks' time, but has not produced any receipt or any document to show the bonafides that he intends to deposit the amount.
3. Though order was passed in the month of February, the petitioner has sought extension of time in the month of July. No such bonafides is shown and even the application seeking extension of time was filed on 30.04.2026.
4. Till today, the petitioner has not made any effort to deposit the amount. The period of six weeks
HC-KAR
sought in the application has also expired by efflux of time. Consequently, the application seeking extension of time has become infructuous. The petitioner has neither deposited the amount nor produced any Demand Draft before this Court. In the absence of any bona fide effort on the part of the petitioner to comply with the earlier order, the application for extension of time is liable to be rejected.
5. Accordingly, the application seeking extension of time is rejected. Consequently, the revision petition also stands dismissed as the same is not admitted and also the conditional order was not complied with sufficient time was given and extended.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
DS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18