Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1468/2022 of SRI N G NAGENDRA Vs SRI K S KASHIVISHWANATH on 2 July 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33033 CRL.RP No. 1468 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1468 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. N.G. NAGENDRA S/O GOVINDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT SITE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1468 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. N.G. NAGENDRA
S/O GOVINDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT SITE NO.36
NEAR CITIZEN SCHOOL
CHAMUNDESHWARI LAYOUT
NANJANGUD TOWN
MYSURU DISTRICT-571 301.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VINAYA KUMAR P., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
SRI. K.S. KASHIVISHWANATH
S/O LATE K.C.SHANMUKHASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.
1(a)
NALINI V.S.,
W/O LATE K.S.VISHWANATH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
1(b)
RAKSHITH PATEL N.K.,
S/O LATE K.S. KASHIVISHWANATH
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
1(c)
CHINMAYE PATEL
D/O LATE K.S. KASHIVISHWANATH
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
NO.3402/A, 16TH CROSS, R.P.ROAD
OPP: IOB BANK, NANJANGUD TOWN
MYSURU DISTRICT-571301.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B. SHARATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR
LRS OF RESPONDENT)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF
CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.09.2022
PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU IN
CRL.A.NO.52/2021 AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
29.01.2021 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND
J.M.F.C., NANJANAGUD IN C.C.NO.589/2018.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court has issued NBW against the petitioner and recalled the same on 16.06.2026 by imposing cost.
2. Today, this matter is called twice in the morning and also in the afternoon, no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Inspite of the matter being listed for admission and the matter is of the year 2022, learned counsel for the petitioner is not pursuing the matter diligently. Earlier, when the matter was not pursued by the petitioner, NBW was issued
HC-KAR
and at the instance of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, NBW was recalled, inspite of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner is not pursuing the matter.
3. The Trial Court imposed the compensation of Rs.2,25,000/- and having perused the material also, when the notice was issued to the petitioner, no reply was issued in respect of the defence of chit fund is concerned and though, the accused is examined as D.W.1, no material is placed on record rebutting the evidence of the complainant. When such being the case, I do not find any ground to consider the revision petition for admission and no grounds are made out to admit the revision petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33