Karnataka High Court
WA/95/2025 of SRI PUTTARAJ Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 30 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:32306-DB WA No. 95 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2025 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI PUTTARAJ S/O LATE MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2025 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI PUTTARAJ
S/O LATE MARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
2.
SRI.M. CHENNAKESHAVA
S/O LATE MARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
MACHOHALLI VILLAGE
KADABAGERE CROSS
DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
BANGALORE DISTRICT
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VINOD C S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND URBAN -DEVELOPMENT,
STATE OF KARNATAKA
M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 009
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BANGALORE-560 020.
4.
THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MURUGESH.V.CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 &
C/R4;
SRI. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE
ENTIRE RECORDS IN WP No-8235/2021 (LA-BDA) ON THE FILE
OF LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present intra Court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 20.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.61154/2014 and other connected writ petitions.
2. After filing the appeal, the learned counsel for the appellants has not chosen to appear on almost all the hearings.
HC-KAR
3. Learned counsel for the respondent-BDA submits that at Paragraph-12 of the affidavit dated 30.06.2026 submitted by the Commissioner, BDA (in W.A.No.175/2025) it has been stated that the appellants in W.A.No.95/2025 have taken the cash and site compensation at the ratio of 50:50 and after accepting the said compensation they have no right to challenge the impugned judgment and order.
4. Considering the above submission of the learned counsel for the respondent-BDA, the writ appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0