Karnataka High Court
MFA/3255/2021 of SMT. K N CHAITRA Vs SRI G MURALI MOHAN on 30 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:32450-DB MFA No. 3255 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3255 OF 2021 (FC) BETWEEN: SMT. K.N. CHAITRA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3255 OF 2021 (FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. K.N. CHAITRA,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
W/O SRI G. MURALI MOHAN,
D/O SRI. M. NARAYANASWAMY,
R/AT 4TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN,
BEHIND BEERESHWARA TEMPEL
KURUBURPET,
KOLAR - 563 101.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. C. PATTABI RAMAN., ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
AND:
1.
SRI. G MURALI MOHAN,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
S/O SRI G. GANGAPPA,
2.
SMT. MANJULA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
2ND WIFE OF SRI G.MURALI MOHAN
RESPONDENTS NOS.1 AND 2 ARE
PRESENTLY
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
R/AT SHANTHIPURAM,
KUPPAM,
CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517 425.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY
COURT
ACT,
AGAINST
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED:04.01.2017 PASSED IN M.C.NO. 40/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KOLAR, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1) (a) AND (b) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
When the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the appellant was not present either in the first call nor in the revised call. Even in the earlier date of listing i.e., on 03.06.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant.
HC-KAR
It appears that the appellant has lost interest to prosecute this appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9 ct-vn