Karnataka High Court
MFA/9476/2025 of SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR Vs SMT. GAYATHRI T C on 30 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:32384-DB MFA No. 9476 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9476 OF 2025 (FC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR SON OF
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9476 OF 2025 (FC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR
SON OF LATE PRAKASH,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: PRIVATE SERVICE,
RESIDING AT NANDIHALLI VILLAGE,
URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. N. K. KANTHARAJU., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. GAYATHRI T C
WIFE OF NAVEEN KUMAR,
DAUGHTER OF CHANDRASHEKHARAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE,
RESIDING AT THIMMANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKKUR POST, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY
COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.
20.09.2025 PASSED IN MC NO.70/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE I
ADDITIONAL
PRL
JUDGE,
FAMILY
COURT,
TUMAKURU,
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B
K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/S.9 OF THE HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, (for brevity 'the Act') has been filed impugning the order dated 20.09.2025 passed by the Ist Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Tumakuru, in M.C.No.70/2022, filed by the appellant/husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking restitution of conjugal rights against the respondent/wife.
2. The Family Court has allowed M.C.No.194/2022 filed by the respondent/wife seeking decree of divorce to dissolve the marriage, which was solemnized on 15.05.2019. The Family Court has noted that the evidence on record would show that marital life between the parties survived only for a few years. There are no children out of the wedlock and there was no marital bliss between the parties.
HC-KAR
3. In the aforesaid circumstances, we find no grounds to interfere with the impugned order dated 20.09.2025 passed in M.C.No.70/2022. Accordingly, the present appeal filed by the Husband seeking restitution of conjugal rights, stands dismissed.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
NG CT: SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20