Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1298/2025 of SRI SREEPADA A Vs SRI SHEKAR on 29 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:32081 CRL.RP No. 1298 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1298 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI SREEPADA A S/O ANANDA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.E-28, 3RD
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1298 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI SREEPADA A
S/O ANANDA KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO.E-28, 3RD CROSS
3RD MAIN, MAGADI ROAD
KAMAKSHIPALYA
RANGANATHAPURA
BANGALORE-560079
AND ALSO AT
M/S ANANDA AND ENTERPRISES
NO.822, 2ND MAIN ROAD
RANGANATHAPURA
KAMAKSHIPALYA
BANGALORE-560079
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GIRISH D M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI SHEKAR
S/O CHIKKACHENNEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NO.34, 6TH CROSS
AZAD NAGAR, CHAMARAJPET
BENGALURU-560018
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 OF BNSS
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.06.2023
PASSED IN C.C.NO.14634/2016 BY THE XIII ADDL. CMM, BENGALURU AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed for orders on non-compliance of office objections.
2. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that the petition is filed on 29.08.2025. Thereafter, the matter was listed before the Registrar on 04.09.2025 and 11.11.2025 for compliance of office objections and on both the occasions, the counsel for the petitioner was absent. On 29.01.2026, the counsel for the petitioner sought time to comply with the office objections before the Registrar so also on 26.02.2026 and granted the time to do the needful. Again on 02.04.2026, the counsel for the petitioner was absent before the Registrar. However, as a last chance, two weeks time was granted for compliance of office objections. On 15.06.2026 also there was
HC-KAR
no representation on behalf of the petitioner before the Registrar and in view of compliance of minimum objections as per SOP, directed to post the matter before the Court.
3. Today, the counsel for the petitioner again seeks time to comply the office objections. Out of eight office objections, five are complied and still, three office objections to be complied. Inspite of sufficient opportunity is granted, the counsel for the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the matter. Hence, there is no ground to keep the matter alive. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN