Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1620/2024 of SMT HEMAKSHI Vs N RADHA on 29 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:32180 CRL.RP No. 1620 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1620 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. HEMAKSHI, W/O SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT BHUVANAHALLI
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1620 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. HEMAKSHI,
W/O SWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT BHUVANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
HASSAN TALUK,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PAVAN T.G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
N. RADHA,
W/O DODDAHONNAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT NO.46, 3RD A CROSS,
CHIKKA BOMMASANDRA,
GKVK POST,
BENGALURU - 560 064.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.S.NAVEEN KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS RP BY
SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT CRL.A.NO.790/2022 DATED
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
01.10.2024 PASSED BY LXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AT BENGALURU THEREBY CONFIRMING THE ORDER
DATED 06.06.2022 PASSED BY THE XVIII ADDL.C.M.M
BENGALURU
IN
C.C.NO.24940/2018
CONVICTING
THE
PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT BY
ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court vide order dated 11.07.2025, suspended the sentence, directing the petitioner to pay 50% of the fine amount including the amount already deposited, within four weeks from the said order, and also directed to execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-. Both the conditions have not been complied with.
2. Even though the matter was sent to the Mediation and the same was not settled. Again the learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission on 22.06.2026 that demand draft would be furnished by making full payment by way of settlement. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
HC-KAR
would submit that, he could not contact the petitioner when the order was passed in the year 2025 itself. Even granting sufficient time, there is no compliance of the order passed by this Court and even after providing an opportunity the petitioner is not pursuing the matter diligently.
Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution and the same is not admitted.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
HR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39