Karnataka High Court

CRL.RP/905/2024 of SRI K RAJANNA Vs SRI M NARAYANASWAMY on 29 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:32080 CRL.RP No. 905 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.905 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI K RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE KEMPANNA R/AT K.G PURA VILLAGE

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.905 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

SRI K RAJANNA

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

S/O LATE KEMPANNA

R/AT K.G PURA VILLAGE

JANGAMKOTE HOBLI

CHEMMANGALA POST

SIDLAGHATTA TALUK-562102

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. THIMMAIAH K H, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI M NARAYANASWAMY

S/O LATE MALLEPPA

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

R/AT HEMARLAHALLI VILLAGE

JANGAMKOTE HOBLI

SIDLAGHATTA TALUK-562102

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. ASHOK KUMAR M, ADVOCATE)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C

PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER AND JUDGMENT PASSED

BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

SIDLAGHATTA IN C.C.NO.262/2017 DATED 19.07.2021 AND

ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner and the respondent along with their respective counsels are present before the Court and filed the joint memo.

2. In terms of the joint memo, the parties have settled the matter for Rs.5,00,000/-. Out of Rs.5,00,000/-, the petitioner/accused has already been deposited Rs.1,50,000/- before the Trial Court and remaining amount of Rs.3,50,000/- has been paid by way of cash to the respondent/complainant and the same has been acknowledged by the respondent and the respondent has no further claim in the said amount.

HC-KAR

3. In terms of the settlement, the petitioner has no objection to release the amount which is in deposit before the Trial Court in favour of the respondent on proper identification.

4. In view of the joint memo, the revision petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead